Can we use Swift as a backend language?

First question is why someone need use Swift as a backend language? I think:

  1. People always seek to use one language solves all kinds of problem. If Swift can use as a backend language, iOS developers can easily change their identities to Full Stack developer. They can use one language to make a whole product iOS client and server.

  2. Beside UI-related classes, Cocoa-touch have a lot of other things. iOS developers can reuse a lot of Cocoa-touch frameworks and a lot of third party frameworks, and a lot of source bases from their iOS codes.

  3. Swift use ARC (Automatic Reference Counting) manage memory, fast, efficient, easy to use. ARC is more convenient than manually manage memory (C/C++), and more efficient and fast than GC (Java/C#).

  4. The typing system of Swift can make server side codes safer.

Finally can we use Swift as a backend language? It depends:

  1. To be a good backend language, Swift needs Apple or third party provide a lot of frameworks for backend usage.

  2. Swift may need some language support to handle concurrent connections.

How to adopt the rapidly changing future and why you old dogs can’t learn new trick

Our world, our future is rapidly changing. At the age of the Industrial Revolution, one invention can change the whole world, change the life style of all the people on the earth. But now, there are so many inventions can change our life. So, try to imagine what will happen.

For example, when Steve Jobs first announced iPhone on January 9, 2007, Nokia didn’t believe apple will be a strong  competitor. But many years later, Nokia and Motorola both were acquired by other company.

People can predict it, It is very normal, in an industry, always some companies rise and others fall.

But at the very moment of iPhone birth, was there anyone can predict, because iPhone and other new smartphones rise, digital camera and digital video recorder industry will  fall?

This is just the iPhone, but what next is auto drive car from Google, Dragon spacecraft from SpaceX, 3D printer, Tesla, Uber, Skybox Imaging, and so on. Any of these can change the whole world, so try to imagine all of these, and others we might not know yet.

How to adopt the rapidly changing future?

I think we need: Open mind, quick learn and work hard.

Open mind

After I heard about Uber, I have thinked it over and over.

And I ask almost every friends in the industry, “If 5 years ago you was chosen to improve the Taxi system by government  or a big company,   they and you want make the Taxi system more smart,  have internet connect ability, what would you do?”

And I said,”I  think you might want put some embed system on the Taxi, might chose x86 embed system or arm, and with 3G and wifi support, and have GPS. Did you?”

They usually said yes.

But Uber never need install any hardware on the car, every driver have a smart phone. And smart phone usually better than some kind embed system on you car.

Now let’s change a different perspective, at the age before Uber,  how to organize all the taxi in a Taxi system?

We must build a call center, there are hundreds of agents deal with customer requests. When you call the Taxi company said you want a ride to airport, one of their agents will pick up you call, and send a radio broadcast to all the Taxi driver in the city. No matter how far away a Taxi to you, the driver can receive  the broadcast, Whose dial first, get the job to pick you up.

This system have 3 problems. First is they can’t guarantee the Taxi nearby get the job, it is means you might have to wait a lot of time. Second is once a driver turn on the radio broadcast receiver, he must listen every  broadcast, no matter far or near. Third is the most important one, is this system can’t easy scale up, because the limitation of human resources and telephone lines.

But how do Uber solve this problem? When you use Uber app to request a ride, there is no one pick up your call, just a server side application check your status, find the cars nearby, and send them information, if one of these cars response, then you get your ride. If not, system will send information to more faraway cars. So you are guaranteed get the most nearby car to pick you up.

Ok, I know today everyone can understand Uber and iPhone. But when iPhone just birthed, so many people said, “I will never buy this kind phone, it doesn’t even have a physical keyboard!!! “. But today, there are so many touch screen phone, and where is the physical keyboard? 

We always think something familiar  is normal, think anything unknown is odd, this is a part of our human nature. But this nature is harmful to us in this rapidly changing age.

We need try to put down prejudice to think deeper and think out of box, keep open mind.

Quick Learn

Every technological revolution will tremendously improve productivity, so people are always wondering this will cause unemployment rise. But after times of  technological revolution human race still keep reproduction and development, life on earth is better than ever.

When productivity improved, same job needs less workers, or same workers less work time. So there will be some unemployment. But people can get cheaper product and work less time. So, when people have more free time, they need entertainments, need social interacts. These needs  give people the opportunity to develop entertainment industry and catering industry. And when these industries rise, they need workers, so unemployment problem is solved.

So, look at a very short period, you will think technological revolution will cause unemployment, but in a long period view, technological revolution only will cause labor redistribution. So, everyone lost jobs in the  technological revolution age, isn’t because he can’t find any job, is because he can’t find a job he can participate in. He just don’t have the skill or learning ability.

Because 3D printer, auto drive car, this time, all the work relate to manual work will be replace by computer. So there will be very large unemployment, but at same time, factories and companies will need more and more programmers and operators to deal with the new computer system.

It will be a disaster, if you can’t learn anything new, and it will be a huge opportunity, if you can quick learn.

Work Hard

This isn’t need to talk a lot.

Talk is easy, but why you old dogs can’t learn new trick?

Everybody think himself, “Open mind, quick learn and work hard”, But there are not so many really are.

At 2009 when I first learned Objective-C and write my iOS app, it took me two weeks. I thought this was slow, but later notice that at that moment in Beijing, maybe only 20-100 people can write Objective-C code.

Three years later, I ask some of the people, they try again and again, but never learn how to write  Objective-C code, “Why can’t you learn Objective-C?”

Someone said,  “Mac is too expensive.”

Someone said, “I think Objective-C is too hard, I really can’t understand [object method]”

Someone said, “I need mentor, but I just can’t find one.”

And someone said, “I need be supervised.”

Then after some years, when swift come out, they said “I finally will learn how to write iOS app”, But I don’t think so.

Maybe swift is easy than Objective-C, but swift is odd too, if you can’t open mind to Objective-C, I think you can’t open mind to swift either.

No one will supervise you, if you want learn quick, you must learn how to self educate.

And, work hard is no meaning before you start.

My first impression of Swift

Just after apple announced swift at WWDC 2014, I downloaded Xcode 6 beta 1, but since then I didn’t have time to really learn swift. Today, I watched the WWDC Session videos about swift (Introduction to Swift, Intermediate Swift, and Advanced Swift).

Why apple make Swift?

There are so many theories about this. In the WWDC keynote, Craig Federighi said, “Now Objective-C has served us so well for 20 years. We absolutely love it. But we had to ask ourselves the question what would it be like we had Objective-C without the baggage of C? “.

Screenshot 2014-07-02 20.46.10

Objective-C is a great programming language,  but it still is a very old language have so many baggages.

What is Objective-C without the C?

If we think from the angle of programming platform, I think  Objective-C platform include:

  1. Language: Objective-C language.
  2. Development tools: Xcode, Interface builder and instrument.
  3. Runtime library: Objective-C Runtime.
  4. Framework: Cocoa and Cocoa touch.

Swift just change the language, but still use the same development tools, runtime library and framework. So Swift can change syntax, but must have so many same  structure with Objective-C underneath. So developer familiar with Objective-C can learn easy and fast, and use their old experiences.

At WWDC session I noticed speaker said swift have 3 key design point: safe, modern and power.

So combine all the above, I think design swift is try to create a new language, safe (strong type), modern (convenient, easy to learn and use), power (not loss any functionality from Objective-C), don’t have any baggage from C, and can be fully supported by Apple’s development infrastructures.

My first impression of the language

1. Swift use strong type, but syntax looks just like weak type.

Strong type language is faster and safer, but need more codes and looks more complex. Weak type language is convenience, easy to learn and use, but more slower and not very safe. At swift you can just  declare type of variables explicitly, like this:

var somestring: String = “this is a string”

You also can declare type of variables implicitly, like this:

var somestring = “this also is a string”

When you don’t explicitly declare type of variables, complier will automate inference type of variables.

2. Swift don’t use single root class.

Java and Objective-C both use single root class. In Objective-C your class normally need inherit from NSObject directly or indirectly. But Swift don’t use single root class, you can inherit from any class or just never inherit anything.

I think this because at the moment of design of Java and Objective-C, there is so many functionality can not very easily implement by complier, so just put them to the root class. Now this kind functionality can implement by language.

3. You don’t need use  class member variables and properties separately

In Swift all class member variables are properties, call stored properties. And if you want a property has some setter and getter, it is a computed property.

4. You don’t need alloc memory for you object

Yeah!!!!  Complier will do it for you.

5. Structure can have computed properties and methods

But structure still have some different with class:

  1. Structure can not inherit from other structure.
  2. Structure is passed by value, Class is passed by reference.

6. Extension can extent any classes, named types even build in types

Extension just like category of Objective-C, can use to extend other classes, but in Swift extension even can extent build in types.

It is convenience and may be dangerous.

Screenshot 2014-07-02 21.18.46


7. Optional and Non-Optional type

Optional type give you the ability to safe checking the variables, make sure they are valid, and it provide a easy and convenience way to do it.


Ok, there are more and more syntax and features in the books and the WWDC session videos. But I just want talk about these, which is easy to learn and may have some different with other languages.

This is already a long article…